The depiction of the Holy Trinity

OODGER– Fr. Panayiotis Vardouniotis – Euxh.gr – May 2017

Hagiography is not any ordinary drawing; it is a portrayal that contains theology. The hagiographer expresses theology from within the image. So, let’s see what the hagiography of “Abraham’s Hospitality” teaches us:

According to the narration of chapter 18 of the Book of Genesis, Abraham – who was very hospitable to strangers – was deemed worthy of offering his hospitality to the Triune God Himself.

The Genesis text (18:1-5) says:

“Then God appeared to him (Abraham), who was seated at the door of his tent by the Mamre oak tree at noon. And, on lifting his gaze, he looked, and behold, three men were standing further up from him; seeing this, he immediately hurried towards them and prostrated himself on the ground. And he said: ‘Lord, if I have found favour in Your sight, do not come away from Your servant. Let water be brought so that they may wash Your feet, and You may refresh Yourself under the tree; I shall take bread and You shall eat, and afterwards You can go on Your way, which You deviated from for Your servant’s sake.”

1) What were the signs that the three visitors were God? Well, Abraham ran towards them and prostrated himself on the ground before them. To the Hebrews, prostration – especially full-body, on the ground – was permitted only for God. Let’s also recall the incident with the Three Young Men who were martyred in the blazing furnace for refusing to bow down before king Nebuchadnezzar and his image. Obviously, full-body prostration is evidence that the person being venerated can only be God. Abraham addressed one of the three visitors with the title “Lord”. In the Old Testament, only Yahwe is the Lord God. Therefore, Abraham was in a state of theophany and “recognized” God in the person of one of the visitors.

2) The second question that is raised from within the narration is: Were those three men the three Persons of the Holy Trinity? Clearly, they were not. The Triune God was only one of the three visitors – the one portrayed in the middle, between the two other persons in the icon. He was the one whom Abraham called “Lord”. In the text the men are three, but Abraham only addressed the one, whom he addressed as “Lord”.

Who were those three men? As we shall see revealed further along (chapter 19) – in the narration regarding Sodom and Gomorrah – the two of the three were angels. The third Person was the pre-Incarnation Logos – the Second Person of the Holy Trinity. Why was it the Logos? Well, in the Holy Bible, the Prophets and the Theumens (“God-sighters”) in the Old Testament and the Apostles in the New Testament saw only the Logos: in the Old Testament, the Logos was not yet incarnate, whereas in the New Testament, He was seen incarnate – in the flesh.

Yahwe-Melek / Angel of the Lord / Proclaimer of the Supreme Will – as mentioned in the Holy Bible – is the not-yet-incarnated Logos. That was how the God-sighting Moses had discoursed with Yahwe-Melek – the not-yet-incarnated Logos, the Son of the Father – from within the blazing (but unconsumed by flames) bush.

But as we now know, from the revelation found in the New Testament, both the Father and the Holy Spirit are “within the Son”. When Philip said to Christ: “Show us the Father…” Christ replied: “I have been with you for so long and yet you do not see Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; so how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me? ” (John 14:9-10)

In other words, Christ was telling him that whoever had seen Him had also seen the Father, because the Son is within the Father, just as the Father is within the Son. The Apostle Paul also wrote in his Epistle to Colossians: “For it pleased the Father that in Him bodily all the fullness of godhood should dwell”. (Col.1:19). This means that the fullness of the Holy Trinity resides in Christ. This was how the Theumens and Prophets of the Old Testament were able to “see” the Father and the Holy Spirit within the pre-Incarnation Logos. By having “seen” the pre-Incarnation, fleshless Logos, they were able to comprehend the existence of the other two persons. This was how Abraham was made worthy of offering hospitality to the entire Holy Trinity: in the Person of the pre-Incarnation, fleshless Logos.

And that is why Orthodox hagiography portrays the Holy Trinity as “The Hospitality of Abraham”.

But we – unfortunately in most churches (not to mention in practically most of them) – have an icon of the Holy Trinity that portrays two men and a bird….

As such, the first mistake is that the three Persons of this Trinity are not similar in appearance, given that two are humans and the one is a bird and consequently, the Trinity depicted in this icon is not “of the same essence” (homo-ousios).

Another mistake is that the Father is portrayed as an old, white-haired man and the Son as a younger man with dark hair. This clearly implies that the one is older than the other in age, which means created Time has been “bestowed” on the Uncreated Holy Trinity. That is, we are basically saying what the heretic Arius had asserted (and also what Arius’ grandchildren – the Jehovah’s Witnesses still assert): that the Son is a creation, since He is younger in years than the Father.

Yet another hagiographical mistake in the icon is that the Father and the Holy Spirit are portrayed with a fleshy body. Of course we know from the teaching of the New Testament that only the Son had put on flesh with His Incarnation. If the other two Persons of the Trinity are with flesh – as portrayed – then we have a problem with the hypostatic characteristics – the personal features – of the three Persons of the Holy Trinity.

The Father begets the Son and issues forth the Holy Spirit.
ONLY THE FATHER begets and issues forth.

The Son is born.
ONLY THE SON is born

And the Holy Spirit issues forth.
ONLY THE HOLY SPIRIT issues forth
That is why the Son was incarnated: because only He has the hypostatic characteristic of being born. If the other two Persons were to be incarnated, then there would be a confusion within the Holy Trinity, with various polytheistic extensions.

Therefore the only correct and appropriate theological depiction of the Holy Trinity is the icon depicting Abraham’s Hospitality.

Translation:  A.N.

*******************

Source: