Religious freedom for all

MUSTAFA AKYOL
akyol@mustafaakyol.org – 7/12/13

I  have spent the past three days in the German capital, to attend an international conference organized by the Archons, a religious order whose main focus is to protect the rights of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Istanbul. But the conference, aptly titled “Tearing down walls,” was focused not only on the Ecumenical Patriarchate or the tinyGreek Orthodox community in Turkey but also other religious minorities that suffer religious freedom violations.

For example, the patriarchate is not recognized by the Turkish state with its authentic and official title, “Ecumenical.” The term, which means “universal,” implies that the patriarchate of Constantinople has authority over all other Orthodox Christians of the world. But Turkish nationalism found this global authority unacceptable – merely out of an immature hubris – and rather defined the institution as the “Patriarchate of Phanar,” referring to the insignificant neighborhood in Istanbul in which the patriarchate is located.

A few years ago, Prime Minister Tayyip Erdoğan eased the official obsession on this issue, saying that he had no problem with the title ecumenical “since the Ottomans did not have a problem with it, either.” Yet still, no official text recognizes the Ecumenical Patriarchate as it is.

But that is the least of the problems. A much bigger one is the status of the Halki Seminary, the only institution in which the patriarchate can train new clergy and thus sustain its tradition. The seminary is closed since 1971, when a military junta decided to shut down or “nationalize” all independent schools.

The AKP government has been promising to reopen the Halki Seminary for a decade, but with no result. Indeed it was expected that Erdoğan would take this much-expected step in his much-hailed “democratization package” of last September, but he did not. Word has it that the government decided to take the Halki Seminary out of the “package” at the last moment.

But why? As I explained in the conference, the AKP’s Ottoman references in fact do not create an ideological obstacle to the reopening of Halki Seminary or other Christian institutions or churches. (After all, Halki Seminary was opened in mid-19th century under Ottoman rule, and was closed down by secularist/nationalist generals in the more “modern” era.)

Yet there is still an obstacle: the “reciprocity” principle between Turkey and Greece. Accordingly, both sides see their Greek and Turkish minorities as people in the wrong countries, and do not take any step for them unless the other side does with regards to its own minority.

This was made clear recently by an AKP official, Metin Külünk. “Do not have a doubt,” he said, “Turkey will not take a step to re-open Halki Seminary until Greece, who did not hold up the promise it gave in Lausanne, opens the Fethiye Mosque in Athens.” Notably his audience was the Western Thrace Turks Solidarity Association, founded by ethnic Turks whose cultural and religious rights have often been violated in Greece.

I despise this “reciprocity” idea, and defend religious freedom everywhere regardless of the political context. It is a political reality, though. Therefore, perhaps calls for more religous freedom will be more productive if they try to see and fix the troubles on both sides of the Aegean. They are quite similar problems created by similarly nationalist mindsets, after all.

Source:

 

CATEGORIES
TAGS
Share This

COMMENTS

Wordpress (2)
  • comment-avatar
    Dr. Pawel Wroblewski 11 years

    A commentary to the 2nd International Conference on Religious Freedom entitled “Tearing Down Walls: Achieving Religious Equality in Turkey” organized in Berlin (Germany), December 4-5th, 2013, by the institutions affiliated with the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople (http://conference.archons.org/).

    The closing of the Halki seminary in 1971 was a painful event for the Greek diaspora in the Republic of Turkey but to demand its re-opening by all means can be seen as a form of historical sentimentalism. An implementation of the postulate may really not change a complicated situation of religious and ethnic minorities in Turkey: indeed, what does it mean to re-open one Orthodox school in comparison to hundred newly opened madrasas? It seems paradoxically that “democratic” changes in the existing regulations regarding religious education in Turkey will imply the possibility of further Islamization of the country.

    There is no doubt that any initiative to create the foundations of anti-discrimination laws for religious
    minorities in Turkey is noble and desirable but it is difficult to accept the form and extent of the Greek Orthodox Church of Constantinople’s involvement in U.S. policy-making. The Greeks of all people should know the best that there is no single ideal paradigm of democracy – its various historical realizations have brought to the proof and none of them has a universal character.

    I just find it hard to believe that patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople has become a puppet in the hands of the globalists. However, claiming that he represents all Orthodox Christians Bartholomew has become like the Pope at the Vatican but a universal primacy is in evident opposition to the traditional Orthodox concept of autocephaly. It also remains doubtful that the Archbishop of Constantinople has a monopoly on use of the title of Ecumenical Patriarch: according to St. Theophanes the Confessor (Chronographia, 2) this title was attributed to the heads of all the churches of the ancient Pentarchy; previously, the general and radical theological objections to the use of the title were formulated by St. Gregory the Dialogist in his many epistles.

    A disturbing Turkey’s engagement in Syria in the context of Christian exodus is definitely more substantial than the problem of the Halki seminary or of recognition of any ecclesiastical privileges and properties. It is difficult to understand that the organizers of the 2nd International Conference on Religious Freedom have other priorities in this matter. It is surprising that it was an event that was held in the EU but practically without the EU.

    Every religion as an instrument of policy ceases to be religion and becomes an ideology – this principle we all should take to heart.

    Dr. Pawel P. Wroblewski

    Expert of Turkish Politics at the Polish Parliamentary Group for the Prevention of
    Discrimination and Persecutions of Christians in the World

    Assistant Professor of Ancient and Medieval Philosophy at the University of Wroclaw, Poland

    Member of the Autocephalous Orthodox Church of Poland

  • comment-avatar
    lapin.grove 11 years

    Turks just plain SUCK!

  • Disqus ( )